Article info
PDFEthics
Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived
- Correspondence to: Anthony Wrigley Centre for Professional Ethics (PEAK), University of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; a.wrigley{at}peak.keele.ac.uk
Citation
Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived
Publication history
- Received October 30, 2006
- Accepted January 8, 2007
- Revised January 5, 2007
- First published August 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
February 27, 2018
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Advance planning in end-of-life care: legal and ethical considerations for neurologists
- Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act
- An introduction to advance care planning in practice
- Healthcare professionals’ understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey
- The Mental Capacity Act 2005: a new framework for healthcare decision making
- Emergency research in children: options for ethical recruitment
- A new law on advance directives in Germany
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
- Participation in dementia research: rates and correlates of capacity to give informed consent