rss
J Med Ethics 2007;33:501-507 doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018697
  • Clinical ethics

Ethics, justification and the prevention of spina bifida

  1. Wendy Jane Gagen,
  2. Jeffrey P Bishop
  1. Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, The Knowledge Spa, Truro, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr W J Gagen
 Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, The Knowledge Spa, Truro TR1 3HD, UK; wendy.gagen{at}pms.ac.uk
  • Received 21 July 2006
  • Accepted 30 August 2006
  • Revised 21 August 2006

Abstract

During the 1970s, prenatal screening technologies were in their infancy, but were being swiftly harnessed to uncover and prevent spina bifida. The historical rise of this screening process and prevention programme is analysed in this paper, and the role of ethical debates in key studies, editorials and letters reported in the Lancet, and other related texts and governmental documents between 1972 and 1983, is considered. The silence that surrounded rigorous ethical debate served to highlight where discussion lay—namely, within the justifications offered for the prevention of spina bifida, and the efficacy and benefits of screening. In other words, the ethical justification for screening and prevention of spina bifida, when the authors are not explicitly interested in ethics, is considered. These justifications held certain notions of disability as costly to society, with an imperative to screen and prevent spina bifida for the good of the society.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.