Article info
PDFGeneral ethics
Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris
- Correspondence to: Professor A J Culyer Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2E9; aculyer{at}iwh.on.ca
Citation
Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris
Publication history
- Received August 14, 2006
- Accepted August 17, 2006
- First published July 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Ageism and equality
- Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?
- All health is not equal: the use of modifiers in NICE technology appraisal
- Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue
- NICE is not cost effective
- It’s not NICE to discriminate
- Is an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure? A cross-sectional study of the impact of English public health grant on mortality and morbidity
- Impact of missed treatment opportunities on outcomes in hospitalised patients with heart failure