rss
J Med Ethics 2007;33:261-265 doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014423
  • Clinical ethics

Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students

  1. C O Sham1,
  2. Y W Cheng1,
  3. K W Ho1,
  4. P H Lai1,
  5. L W Lo1,
  6. H L Wan1,
  7. C Y Wong1,
  8. Y N Yeung1,
  9. S H Yuen1,
  10. A Y C Wong2
  1. 1University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
  1. Correspondence to:
 MrC O Sham
 Flat 8B, Block 2, Julimount Garden, 8–12 Fu Kin Street, Shatin, Hong Kong; philipsham{at}hkusua.hku.hk
  • Received 12 September 2005
  • Accepted 12 June 2006
  • Revised 6 June 2006

Abstract

Objectives: To study the attitudes of both medical and non-medical students towards the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision in a university in Hong Kong, and the factors affecting their attitudes.

Methods: A questionnaire-based survey conducted in the campus of a university in Hong Kong. Preferences and priorities of participants on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in various situations and case scenarios, experience of death and dying, prior knowledge of DNR and basic demographic data were evaluated.

Results: A total of 766 students participated in the study. There were statistically significant differences in their DNR decisions in various situations between medical and non-medical students, clinical and preclinical students, and between students who had previously experienced death and dying and those who had not. A prior knowledge of DNR significantly affected DNR decision, although 66.4% of non-medical students and 18.7% of medical students had never heard of DNR. 74% of participants from both medical and non-medical fields considered the patient’s own wish as the most important factor that the healthcare team should consider when making DNR decisions. Family wishes might not be decisive on the choice of DNR.

Conclusions: Students in medical and non-medical fields held different views on DNR. A majority of participants considered the patient’s own wish as most important in DNR decisions. Family wishes were considered less important than the patient’s own wishes.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. A correction has been published
  5. erratum

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.