Article Text

PDF

Characteristics of deaths occurring in hospitalised children: changing trends
  1. Padmanabhan Ramnarayan1,
  2. Finella Craig2,
  3. Andy Petros2,
  4. Christine Pierce2
  1. 1Children’s Acute Transport Service (CATS), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  2. 2Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr P Ramnarayan
 Children’s Acute Transport Service and Paediatric Intensive Care, Children’s Acute Transport Service (CATS), 44B Bedford Row, London WC1R 4LL, UK; ramnarayan{at}msn.com

Abstract

Background: Despite a gradual shift in the focus of medical care among terminally ill patients to a palliative model, studies suggest that many children with life-limiting chronic illnesses continue to die in hospital after prolonged periods of inpatient admission and mechanical ventilation.

Objectives: To (1) examine the characteristics and location of death among hospitalised children, (2) investigate yearwise trends in these characteristics and (3) test the hypothesis that professional ethical guidance from the UK Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (1997) would lead to significant changes in the characteristics of death among hospitalised children.

Methods: Routine administrative data from one large tertiary-level UK children’s hospital was examined over a 7-year period (1997–2004) for children aged 0–18 years. Demographic details, location of deaths, source of admission (within hospital vs external), length of stay and final diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases-10 codes) were studied. Statistical significance was tested by the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of ranks and median test (non-parametric variables), χ2 test (proportions) and Cochran–Armitage test (linear trends).

Results: Of the 1127 deaths occurring in hospital over the 7-year period, the majority (57.7%) were among infants. The main diagnoses at death included congenital malformations (22.2%), perinatal diseases (18.1%), cardiovascular disorders (14.9%) and neoplasms (12.4%). Most deaths occurred in an intensive care unit (ICU) environment (85.7%), with a significant increase over the years (80.1% in 1997 to 90.6% in 2004). There was a clear increase in the proportion of admissions from in-hospital among the ICU cohort (14.8% in 1998 to 24.8% in 2004). Infants with congenital malformations and perinatal conditions were more likely to die in an ICU (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.55), and older children with malignancy outside the ICU (OR 6.5, 95% CI 4.4 to 9.6). Children stayed for a median of 13 days (interquartile range 4.0–23.25 days) on a hospital ward before being admitted to an ICU where they died.

Conclusions: A greater proportion of hospitalised children are dying in an ICU environment. Our experience indicates that professional ethical guidance by itself may be inadequate in reversing the trends observed in this study.

  • CCC, chronic complex condition
  • ICU, intensive care unit
  • IQR, interquadrile range
  • LST, life-sustaining treatment
  • RCPCH, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Improvements in medical expertise and technology have led to a significant reduction in infant and childhood mortality over the past few decades. Death among children aged 0–19 years is now uncommon (1.3–2.0 deaths/1000 population).1,2 With the exception of unexpected mortality resulting from injury or acute illness, a significant proportion of children die as a result of chronic complex conditions (CCCs) requiring prolonged medical care and repeated hospital admissions, such as AIDS, metabolic disorders, cancer, cystic fibrosis, extreme prematurity and severe congenital anomalies.3 In these children, early death is an inevitable outcome of their disease process, and the trajectory of their illness leading up to the terminal phase often follows a predictable pattern.

Over the past few decades, the model of care during terminal illness has moved away from the traditional medical approach of aggressive treatment with curative intent to symptom care with palliative intent.4–7 It is clear that many terminally ill adults prefer to die at home rather than in hospital,8,9 and that hospitalised adult patients often agree to waive invasive and painful life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) through “advance directives” and do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.10,11 Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders remain uncommon in paediatric practice,12 and it still remains unclear what parental and, more importantly, children’s choices are regarding the optimal nature and location of end-of-life care.13,14 Only 17% of children with CCCs died at home in the state of Washington between 1980 and 1998; 75% of deaths occurred in hospital.15 This study did suggest a trend towards more home deaths in the >1 year age group in recent years, indicating that parents of older children with terminal illnesses might prefer this option. Involvement of a palliative care team and an active approach to end-of-life decision-making is more likely to occur in some specialties than others: children with incurable malignancies are more likely to die at home than children with other CCCs.16,17

A number of recent studies have indicated that most children dying in hospital die in an intensive care environment.18–20 In particular, children with chronic conditions seem to experience longer periods of hospitalisation and mechanical ventilation before death.21 Uncertainty among medical staff about when to withhold LST, and among parents regarding the nature of optimal end-of-life care, may lead to the initiation of intensive care in the face of deteriorating illness. In most paediatric intensive care units (ICUs), withdrawal or limitation of life support has replaced failed resuscitation as the main pathway of death.22–24 As a response to the ethical uncertainties faced by practitioners, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), UK, produced a framework for practice in 1997, describing the circumstances under which it may be reasonable to withhold or withdraw LST.25 These circumstances included brain stem death, permanent vegetative state, a “no-chance” situation (LST simply delays death with no alleviation of suffering), a “no-purpose” situation (the physical or mental impairment is so severe that it is unreasonable to expect the child to bear it), and an “unbearable” situation for parents and/or family (irrespective of medical opinion). As this document provided significant professional guidance for paediatricians in the UK, we hypothesised that it would influence the nature and location of in-hospital end-of-life care for children with CCCs. Changes resulting from this guidance may significantly influence decisions regarding resource allocation for ICUs as well as non-ICU children’s wards, and affect the provision of appropriate end-of-life training for staff caring for terminally ill children. To provide robust data, on which planning of resources and professional training could be based, we examined trends in the characteristics of deaths occurring among hospitalised children in one large tertiary-level referral children’s hospital in the UK.

METHODS

Our study examined deaths among hospitalised children over a period of 7 years (1 April 1997 to 31 March 2004). The year 1997 was deliberately chosen to include data from the time that the RCPCH guidance was published, and data were collected until a revised version of the guidance was made available in 2004.26 We hypothesised that discernible changes in clinical practice would be apparent within 3–4 years of publication. Formal ethical approval was not deemed necessary for routinely collected anonymised data examined in this audit.

The studied children’s hospital served mainly as a tertiary referral centre for children with complex paediatric conditions. There were 335 inpatient beds in 30 wards, which served all major medical and surgical specialties. There were three intensive care areas in the hospital—neonatal surgical, general paediatric and cardiac surgical. The hospital also served as a quaternary centre for specialised treatments such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiac transplantation. There was no children’s emergency department on site, implying that acutely ill children were admitted directly to hospital specialist wards from referring hospitals and from home. The ICUs admitted children from referring hospitals (external referrals) and from various specialist wards within the hospital (internal referrals).

Data used in this study were drawn from the hospital information services department and the ICU database. These databases prospectively recorded demographic and clinical data on all children admitted to the hospital and to the ICUs. Information collected as part of the study consisted of basic demographic data, yearwise breakdown of the number of admissions to the hospital and to the ICUs, number of deaths in the hospital and the ICUs, location of death, location immediately before being admitted to the area on which children died, length of stay at this location and referral patterns from external hospitals to the hospital and the ICUs. A list of all International Classification of Diseases-10-coded diagnoses (primary and secondary) ascribed at the end of each inpatient episode was also collected for the dataset. Primary diagnoses ascribed after hospital death were grouped for analysis according to the parent diagnostic categories in the International Classification of Diseases-10 classification.

The main variable of interest was the location of hospital death (ICU vs non-ICU). We examined changes in this variable over a 7-year period. We also analysed changes in referral patterns among children who died in ICUs and hospital wards, location before admission to area where death occurred, and length of stay in that location. These analyses were performed separately for the general paediatric ICU, as most children with acute medical illnesses were admitted to this area. To explain observed trends in the key variables, we examined overall changes in hospital and ICU admission and mortality rates over the years, as well as referral patterns of inpatient admissions. These constituted explanatory variables.

Statistical analysis

Non-parametric tests such as the median test and the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of ranks were used to analyse differences between groups for continuous variables. Differences between groups for proportions were analysed for statistical significance using the χ2 test. The Cochran–Armitage test for linear trend was used to examine yearwise trends. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, 1127 children died while in hospital. The mean age of these children was 3.33 years (95% CI 3.05 to 3.62 years); median age 209 days (interquartile range (IQR) 25–1810 days). Table 1 represents the main characteristics of hospital non-survivors.

Table 1

 Main characteristics of hospital non-survivors

Slightly more than one-half of hospital deaths occurred in infants <1 year of age (650/1127, 57.7%); young adults aged >14 years accounted for only 6.2% of the deaths. Yearwise analysis did not suggest any significant trends in the distribution of age groups among children dying in hospital (Cochran–Armitage test, p>0.05). Most hospital deaths were attributed to congenital malformations and perinatal diseases (454/1127; 40.3%), with neoplasms and cardiovascular disorders also accounting for a significant proportion. Most hospital deaths occurred in ICUs: 966/1127 (85.7%, 95% CI 83.7% to 87.7%); the majority of children who died in hospital were referred from an external hospital.

ICU deaths

Of the 1127 children who died in hospital, 966 died in an ICU. Most deaths occurred in the general paediatric ICU, with smaller proportions occurring in the cardiac and neonatal surgical ICUs. Non-survivors in ICU settings were significantly younger than in the non-ICU cohort (median age at death 163 days vs 806 days, median test p<0.001); far fewer infants died in non-ICU areas (39.7% vs 60.7%, χ2 test, p<0.001). Children with congenital malformations and perinatal diseases were more likely to die in an ICU (odds ratio (OR) 2.42, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.55). Data regarding the source of admission were available on 845 ICU deaths. The vast majority of children were admitted from a referring external hospital; internal referrals constituted an average of 22.7%. Table 2 summarises these results.

Table 2

 Main characteristics of intensive care unit non-survivors

Yearwise analysis showed that there was a rise in the proportion of hospital deaths occurring in an ICU setting from 80.1% in 1997–8 to 90.6% in 2003–4 (fig 1). This increase indicated a significant trend (p = 0.016). This trend was also true for general paediatric ICU deaths (33.1% of hospital deaths in 1997; 41.9% in 2004; p<0.01). Owing to incomplete data in the 1997 cohort, only deaths from a 6-year period (1998–2003) were analysed for the source of ICU admission (fig 2). The proportion of internal referrals among ICU deaths rose steadily over the years (14.8% in 1998 to 24.8% in 2003), indicating a significant trend (p = 0.023). Yearwise analysis of the age distribution of ICU non-survivors did not show significant changes over the years.

Figure 1

 Yearwise analysis of proportion of hospital deaths occurring in intensive care units.

Figure 2

 Yearwise distribution of internal referrals among intensive care unit deaths.

Among children referred from within the institution to the ICU (internal referrals), the median length of stay on a specialty ward before ICU admission was 13 days (IQR 4.0–23.25). There was no significant change over the 6-year period examined in this variable (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.25).

Non-ICU deaths

In all, 161 children died in hospital wards other than an ICU during the study period (14.3%, 95% CI 12.3% to 16.3%). The majority of deaths occurred in oncology, cardiology and neurology wards. Median age of non-survivors was 2.2 years (IQR 162 days–7.2 years). In contrast with the ICUs, children aged 1–14 years accounted for more deaths in the wards (52.8% vs 33.3%; χ2 test, p<0.001). A large proportion of children with neoplasms who died in hospital had their end-of-life events managed in the ward (42.8%, OR 6.5, 95% CI 4.4 to 9.6). For congenital malformations, this proportion was <15%. Table 3 summarises these results. Data regarding the source of admission were available for 131 non-ICU deaths. Most children had been transferred from an ICU area; these children stayed for a median of 12 days in an ICU before being admitted to the ward where they died.

Table 3

 Main characteristics of children dying in hospital wards (non-intensive care unit)

Yearwise analysis showed a significant decline in the proportion of hospital deaths occurring in non-ICU settings (19.8% in 1997–1998 to 9.4% in 2003–2004; p<0.05). There were no significant changes in the age distribution or source of admission over the years; there was a non-significant decline in the proportion of children who died in the ward after admission from an ICU from 44.4% in 1998 to 40% in 2003 (p = 0.48).

Hospital and ICU admissions

During the study period, 161 530 children were admitted to the hospital, of whom 21 100 (13%) were referred from external hospitals. ICU admission data were available only for six consecutive years (1998–2004): 15 240 children were admitted to the combined ICUs (10.9% of hospital admissions in this period). In all, 4433 were admitted to the general paediatric ICU (29.1%). Hospital and ICU mortality rate (1998–2004) were 0.7% and 5.5%, respectively (8.7% for the general paediatric ICU).

Yearwise distribution of ICU admissions as a proportion of total hospital admissions showed a significant reduction from 11.6% in 1998 to 9.9% in 2004 (p<0.001). There was no significant change in hospital or ICU mortality rate over the 6-year period studied (p>0.1). Table 4 shows these results. ICU mortality rate in the subgroup consisting of only internal referrals increased, with a clear yearwise trend (1.2–2.3%; p<0.05).

Table 4

 Hospital and intensive care unit admissions and mortality rates

DISCUSSION

This study shows that the proportion of hospitalised children dying in an intensive care environment has increased year after year. Currently, only 1 of 10 hospital deaths occur outside the ICU. The proportion of referrals from within the hospital contributing to ICU deaths has risen gradually. Infants represent a large proportion of children dying in an ICU; older children (1–14 years) constitute the majority in non-ICU settings. Most children with congenital malformations, perinatal conditions and injury seem to die in the ICU, whereas a significant number of children with malignancy experience their end-of-life in a non-ICU setting. These trends are significant considering that there were no major changes to hospital or ICU admission rates over the study period, and that hospital and ICU mortality rates did not vary considerably over the years.

There is a paucity of evidence in the literature regarding trends in mortality in other healthcare settings, although a number of studies have provided cross-sectional corroborative data on the location of in-hospital death. In a study examining the circumstances surrounding end-of-life care in Alberta, McCallum et al19 reported that 83.5% of hospital deaths occurred in the ICU. This finding has also been supported by numerous recent studies from various settings.8,20,27 By contrast, only 52.3% of hospital deaths occurred in the ICU environment in a recent study from Toronto.28 It is unclear whether these differences are attributable to hospital characteristics or their end-of-life policies. We set out to explore changes in the nature and location of hospital end-of-life care after the publication of the RCPCH framework for practice in 1997. This guidance broadly describes five conditions in which it might be justified to discuss the withholding or withdrawal of LSTs with parents. These circumstances included brain stem death, permanent vegetative state, a “no-chance” situation (LST simply delays death with no alleviation of suffering), a “no-purpose” situation (the physical or mental impairment is so severe that it is unreasonable to expect the child to bear it) and an “unbearable” situation for parents and/or family (irrespective of medical opinion). We anticipated that judicious use of this professional guidance in ambulatory, hospital and the ICU environment may facilitate a more active approach to the assessment of terminally ill children who may not benefit from initiating or continuing LST, so that early discussions may be initiated with parents about the limitation of aggressive non-beneficial treatments. It appears from this study that this assumption may have been based on simplistic. Multiple reasons, other than just the lack of ethical guidance regarding withholding of LST may contribute to the adoption of an aggressive approach among children with CCCs while being admitted to hospital. This may lead to an increasing proportion of hospital deaths occurring on the ICU. The simplest explanation for this phenomenon is that the actual course and prognosis of acute illness, especially among children with CCCs, is often not clear until after initiation of LST and assessment of clinical response to such treatment.21 It is equally possible that parental and societal expectations regarding children’s good health and long life spans prompts them to seek aggressive curative care despite the benefits of such a course being unclear.29 Medical staff may also find it difficult to accomplish the transition from curative care to palliative care, especially if they believe that further treatment may benefit the child.30 Finally, the increasing unfamiliarity with end-of-life care among non-ICU staff may itself perpetuate this trend, leading to a vicious cycle of poor training, loss of confidence and reluctance to deal with the process of death.31

Irrespective of the reasons for changes in the nature of end-of-life care among hospitalised children, their effects constitute important considerations. For the individual child and parents, the experience of death is more unpleasant when it occurs within the circumstances of intensive care admission, multiple painful procedures, sedation, paralysis and other complications of ICU stay, despite significant improvements in end-of-life care in ICUs. This is especially true if the benefit of such LST was unclear at admission. By contrast, the management of grief is easier when parents are able to retain control over their child’s end-of-life care,32 which is easier to achieve at home, in a hospice or even in-hospital outside the intensive care setting.33–35 There is also evidence that adverse psychological consequences among parents and siblings following the death of a child are diminished when it occurs as part of a home care programme.36 Preliminary evidence from early intervention of our palliative care team suggests that when offered the option, parents of children with varied CCCs associated with a life-threatening complication choose to refuse ICU admission and choose home death.37 (Craig F, unpublished data). On a systematic level, the trends showed in this study may heavily influence the optimal management and the use of scarce healthcare resources. As a greater proportion of children have their end-of-life events managed in an ICU, further discussion on optimal resource allocation to ICUs and hospital wards is crucial.

As the reasons leading to the frequent use of ICUs to manage end-of-life care may be multi-factorial, one solution may be the creation of a multidisciplinary combined paediatric intensive care and palliative care team, consisting of hospital specialists, palliative care staff and intensive care clinicians. This team could be used to advise and assist a child’s primary healthcare team during early discussions with parents regarding the optimal management of their child’s predicted end-of-life care. Such a team will also help to improve the lack of training among most healthcare staff about end-of-life care. Physicians have traditionally been trained to sustain life, not to manage death.38 End-of-life decision-making does not form a component in most postgraduate training programmes,30 and the increasing unfamiliarity of non-ICU trainees with death further exacerbates the lack of training opportunities. As end-of-life decision-making forms a considerable proportion of their workload, ICU trainees and nursing staff will also need formal assessment and training in the provision of optimal end-of-life care.39

We note several limitations to this study. We were unable to identify whether the reduction in the number of deaths among hospitalised children outside the ICU environment is attributable to a rise in the number of home deaths. The lack of a defined catchment area made it difficult to collect information on home deaths. Great Ormond Street Hospital may not represent a typical children’s hospital: supra-regional services were available, no emergency department was present and the patient population consisted of mainly chronic complex paediatric conditions. Although we were able to show that there was no significant change in hospital admissions or mortality, it is possible that the acuity of admissions rose with the years, leading to a greater volume of referrals of sick children to the ICUs. We also assumed that internal referrals were prioritised before external referrals when ICU admission decisions were made, a policy that may have varied over the study period. Finally, our study did not aim to formally explore the reasons for the trends observed in this study, which would provide useful insights into future service developments.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of hospitalised children currently die in an intensive care environment. Referrals from within the hospital now constitute a greater proportion of ICU deaths, perhaps reflecting the prevalence of children with complex paediatric conditions. These trends may significantly affect optimal resource allocation and use, as well as training of clinical staff in end-of-life care. In combination with clear professional guidance, the implementation of innovative and multifaceted strategies is essential at a national and local level to reverse the trends shown in this study.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.