Article info
PDFMedical ethics
How to take deontological concerns seriously in risk–cost–benefit analysis: a re-interpretation of the precautionary principle
- Correspondence to: S D John Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK; sdj22{at}cam.ac.uk
Citation
How to take deontological concerns seriously in risk–cost–benefit analysis: a re-interpretation of the precautionary principle
Publication history
- Received December 15, 2005
- Accepted May 9, 2006
- Revised December 15, 2005
- First published March 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs?
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Epistemic paternalism in public health
- Against moral theories: reply to Benatar
- Strengthening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Are cytokine gene polymorphisms associated with outcome in patients with idiopathic intermediate uveitis in the United Kingdom?
- High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics
- What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research?