Article Text
Abstract
Benefit sharing has been a recurrent theme in international debates for the past two decades. However, despite its prominence in law, medical ethics and political philosophy, the concept has never been satisfactorily defined. In this conceptual paper, a definition that combines current legal guidelines with input from ethics debates is developed. Philosophers like boxes; protective casings into which they can put concisely-defined concepts. Autonomy is the human capacity for self-determination; beneficence denotes the virtue of good deeds, coercion is the intentional threat of harm and so on. What about benefit sharing? Does the concept have a box and are the contents clearly defined? The answer to this question has to be no. The concept of benefit sharing is almost unique in that various disciplines use it regularly without precise definitions. In this article, a definition for benefit sharing is provided, to eliminate unnecessary ambiguity.
- CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity
- OAU, Organisation of African Unity
- OED, Oxford English dictionary
- Unesco, United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation
- WTO, World Trade Organisation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
↵i Ruth Macklin and Udo Schuklenk pointed this out to me.
-
Competing interests: None.
Other content recommended for you
- Sharing the benefits of genetic research
- Asymmetry in Scientific Method and Limits to Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue
- Viewing benefit sharing in global health research through the lens of Aristotelian justice
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Genes, race and research ethics: who’s minding the store?
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
- Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research
- Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysis
- Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study