Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Ethical reflections on Edward Jenner’s experimental treatment
- Correspondence to: H Davies Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC), 50 Eastbourne Terrace, London W2 6 LX, UK; Hugh.davies{at}corec.org.uk
Citation
Ethical reflections on Edward Jenner’s experimental treatment
Publication history
- Received November 23, 2005
- Accepted April 24, 2006
- Revised April 11, 2006
- First published February 28, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- “Cotton Mather, you dog, dam you! I’l inoculate you with this; with a pox to you”: smallpox inoculation, Boston, 1721
- Anti-vaccinationists past and present
- Put Edward Jenner’s statue back in Trafalgar Square
- George Boole, saucy little Alice and an uneventful smallpox vaccination: one of the greatest stories never told
- How to hold an ethical pox party
- Making the right decision: Benjamin Franklin’s son dies of smallpox in 1736
- A vaccine scare in 19th century Northampton
- Monkeypox as an emerging infectious disease: the ophthalmic implications
- Edward Jenner's Inquiry after 200 years
- Infectious disease control in the Ionian Islands during the British Protection (1815–1864)