Article Text

PDF
Ethical reflections on Edward Jenner’s experimental treatment
  1. Hugh Davies
  1. Correspondence to:
 H Davies
 Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC), 50 Eastbourne Terrace, London W2 6 LX, UK; Hugh.davies{at}corec.org.uk

Abstract

In 1798 Dr Edward Jenner published his famous account of “vaccination”. Some claim that a Research Ethics Committee, had it existed in the 1790s, might have rejected his work. I provide the historical context of his work and argue that it addressed a major risk to the health of the community, and, given the devastating nature of smallpox and the significant risk of variolation, the only alternative preventative measure, Jenner’s study had purpose, justification and a base in the practice of the day.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.