Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Critical care of neonates
The recently published report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine, is a valuable contribution to the discussion of decision making in the critical care of neonates. Drawing upon medical evidence, the working party highlights the many practical difficulties arising in neonatal care and by setting out clearly the nature of the ethical and other issues arising in this area of medicine, and their relationship with neonatal development, the resulting report has the potential to lead both to improved practice and to better informed communication between doctors and families when they face difficult decisions about how best to treat very premature babies. Based on medical evidence, the working party sets out guidelines on decision-making about the resuscitation of babies born before the gestational age of 25 weeks and 6 days, dividing this period into four chronological periods: before 21 weeks and 6 days when resuscitation should normally only take place within the context of a research project; between 22 weeks and 23 weeks when resuscitation should not normally be carried out unless the parents request it; at 23 or 24 weeks when parental views should take precedence; and, after 24 weeks when resuscitation should be the norm unless not in the child’s best interests.
There are several practical ethical difficulties with this aspect of the advice. To what extent, for example, does the paediatric assessment of the child, intended to play a role in decision-making about the appropriateness of resuscitation, itself depend on the initiation of resuscitation? To what extent is it reasonable and humane to expect parents to take full responsibility for making decisions about resuscitation between 23 and 24 weeks? On what grounds is it acceptable to attempt to resuscitate a baby <21 weeks and 6 …
Footnotes
-
Competing interest: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Passive euthanasia
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- Three myths in end-of-life care
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
- The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- Ethically complex decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit: impact of the new French legislation on attitudes and practices of physicians and nurses