Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Female genital mutilation: the ethical impact of the new Italian law
- Correspondence to: V Fineschi Department of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Policlinico Ospedali Riuniti, Via Luigi Pinto 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy; vfinesc{at}tin.it
Citation
Female genital mutilation: the ethical impact of the new Italian law
Publication history
- Received January 30, 2006
- Accepted March 16, 2006
- Revised March 14, 2006
- First published January 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital mutilation in the Sudan: survey of the attitude of Khartoum university students towards this practice
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) in UK children: a review of a dedicated paediatric service for FGM
- Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
- Female genital mutilation in children presenting to a London safeguarding clinic: a case series
- Epidemiological surveillance study of female genital mutilation in the UK
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the consequences of female genital mutilation on maternal and perinatal health outcomes in European and African countries
- Multidisciplinary approach to the management of children with female genital mutilation (FGM) or suspected FGM: service description and case series
- Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries
- Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified?