Article Text
Abstract
Background: More and more quantitative information is becoming available about the risks of complications arising from medical treatment. In everyday practice, this raises the question whether each and every risk, however low, should be disclosed to patients. What could be good reasons for doing or not doing so? This will increasingly become a dilemma for practitioners.
Objective: To report doctors’ views on whether to disclose or withhold information on low risks of complications.
Methods: In a qualitative study design, 37 respondents (gastroenterologists and gynaecologists or obstetricians) were included. Focus group interviews were held with 22 respondents and individual in-depth interviews with 15.
Results: Doctors have doubts about disclosing or withholding information on complication risk, especially in a risk range of 1 in 200 to 1 in 10 000. Their considerations on whether to disclose or to withhold information depend on a complicated mix of patient and doctor-associated reasons; on medical and personal considerations; and on the kind and purpose of intervention.
Discussion: Even though the degree of a risk is important in a doctor’s considerations, the severity of the possible complications and patients’ wishes and competencies have an important role as well. Respondents said that low risks should always be communicated when there are alternatives for the intervention or when the patient may prevent or mitigate the risk. When the appropriateness of disclosing risks is doubtful, doctors should always tell their patients that no intervention is without risk, give them the opportunity to gather all the information they need or want, and enable them to detect a complication at an early stage.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study
- Ability of risk scores to predict a low complication risk in patients admitted for suspected acute coronary syndrome
- Exploring Norwegian homecare healthcare professionals’ perceptions of risk and the link to high-quality care: a qualitative multiple case study
- Abstracts
- Stratification of inflammatory bowel disease outpatients by disease activity and risk of complications to guide out-of-hospital monitoring: a patient-centred quality improvement project
- Management of Crohn’s stricture: medical, endoscopic and surgical therapies
- Individualised consent for endoscopy: update on the 2016 BSG guidelines
- ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study
- Derivation and validation of a predictive model for advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults
- Consecutive negative findings on colonoscopy during surveillance predict a low risk of advanced neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with long-standing colitis: results of a 15-year multicentre, multinational cohort study