Property and the body: Applying Honoré
Abstract
This paper argues that the new commercial and quasi-commercial activities of medicine, scientists, pharmaceutical companies and industry with regard to human tissue has given rise to a whole new way of valuing our bodies. It is argued that a property framework may be an effective and constructive method of exploring issues arising from this. The paper refers to A M Honoré’s theory of ownership and aims to show that we have full liberal ownership of our own bodies and as such can be considered to be self-owners.
Footnotes
-
↵i Moore v Regents of the University of California 793 P 2d (Cal, 1990) is a good example of how advancing biotechnology and the commercial activities surrounding such technology can lead to concerns over the control and ownership of human tissue.
-
↵ii Note that this is an Anglo-American/Western European conception of property and the body.
-
↵iii This was not explicit in the original text but was suggested by Richard Flathman.4
-
↵iv Honoré admits that the reason for this may merely be a deficiency in legal linguistics, as the body is not an “external material object”; however, he declares that it is more likely to be because “it has been thought undesirable that a person should alienate his body” (p 180).1
-
↵v As Steiner astutely puts it “it’s not that slaves have few rights: they have none”. (p 231)2
-
Competing interests: None
