Article info
Law, ethics and medicine
Relevance and limits of the principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine
- Dr G Niveau, IUML, Avenue de Champel 9, 1211 Geneve 4, Switzerland; Gerard.Niveau{at}hcuge.ch
Citation
Relevance and limits of the principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine
Publication history
- Received June 15, 2006
- Revised September 20, 2006
- Accepted September 22, 2006
- First published September 28, 2007.
Online issue publication
September 28, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2007 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Equivalence of care’ in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?
- Examining the role of healthcare professionals in the use of solitary confinement
- Prison health services
- Mapping palliative care provision in European prisons: an EAPC Task Force Survey
- How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
- Rates of opioid agonist treatment prescribing in provincial prisons in Ontario, Canada, 2015–2018: a repeated cross-sectional analysis
- Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
- Rethinking standards on prison cell size in a (post)pandemic world: a scoping review
- How to run a prison sexually transmitted infection service
- Pitfalls of tuberculosis programmes in prisons