Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Framing, truth telling and the problem with non-directive counselling
- Correspondence to: Deborah Kirklin Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Center for Medical Humanities, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Archway Campus, 2nd Floor Holborn Union Building, 2–10 Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW, UK; d.kirklin{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Citation
Framing, truth telling and the problem with non-directive counselling
Publication history
- Received December 8, 2005
- Accepted March 10, 2006
- Revised March 9, 2006
- First published January 5, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- MMR vaccine - how effective and how safe?
- Measles vaccination and antibody response in autism spectrum disorders
- MMR: marginalised, misrepresented and rejected? Autism: a focus group study
- Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and bowel problems or developmental regression in children with autism: population study
- MMR: where are we now?
- MMR vaccine—worries are not justified
- Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study
- Improving MMR vaccination rates: herd immunity is a realistic goal
- Protecting people with multiple sclerosis through vaccination
- Effect of Pentavac and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination on the intestine