Article metrics
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”
- Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Intervening in clinical research to prevent the onset of psychoses: conflicts and obligations
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Do we really know how many clinical trials are conducted ethically? Why research ethics committee review practices need to be strengthened and initial steps we could take to strengthen them
- Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust
- Equipoise, standard of care and consent: responding to the authorisation of new COVID-19 treatments in randomised controlled trials
- Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers