rss
J Med Ethics 2006;32:530-534 doi:10.1136/jme.2005.012807
  • Research ethics

Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards

  1. J de Champlain1,
  2. J Patenaude2
  1. 1Centre de recherche clinique, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke
  1. Correspondence to:
 J Patenaude
 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 Twelfth Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1H 5N4; johane.patenaude{at}usherbrooke.ca
  • Received 9 June 2005
  • Accepted 27 December 2005
  • Revised 25 October 2005

Abstract

Objective: To examine how research ethics boards (REBs) review research projects in emerging disciplines such as functional neuroimaging.

Design: To compare the criteria applied and the decisions reached by REBs that reviewed the same mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging.

Participants: 44 Canadian biomedical REBs, mostly working in public university or hospital settings.

Main measurements: The mock research protocol “The Neurobiology of Social Behavior” included several ethical issues operating at all three levels: personal, institutional and social. Data consisting of responses to closed questions were analysed quantitatively. Qualitative analysis of open-question responses used mixed classification.

Results: Similar criteria were used by most participating REBs. Yet the project was unconditionally approved by 3 REBs, approved conditionally by 10 and rejected by 30.

Conclusions: The results point to the difficulty for REBs of reviewing all kinds of research projects, regardless of field, by relying on international and national norms framed in general terms and a possible variation between REBs in the interpretation of their mandate for the protection of research subjects.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.