Article Text
General ethics
Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
Abstract
In this article, transhumanism is considered to be a quasi-medical ideology that seeks to promote a variety of therapeutic and human-enhancing aims. Moderate conceptions are distinguished from strong conceptions of transhumanism and the strong conceptions were found to be more problematic than the moderate ones. A particular critique of Boström’s defence of transhumanism is presented. Various forms of slippery slope arguments that may be used for and against transhumanism are discussed and one particular criticism, moral arbitrariness, that undermines both weak and strong transhumanism is highlighted.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Embryonic stem cell research is not dehumanising us
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Human enhancement and perfection
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- Devoured by our own children: the possibility and peril of moral status enhancement
- Should we enhance animals?
- Ethics of a relaxed antidoping rule accompanied by harm-reduction measures
- What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?