Article info
Clinical ethics
Clinical ethical dilemmas: convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities
- Correspondence to: Dr Anne M Stiggelbout Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, P O Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; a.m.stiggelbout{at}lumc.nl
Citation
Clinical ethical dilemmas: convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities
Publication history
- Received January 28, 2005
- Accepted October 3, 2005
- Revised September 30, 2005
- First published June 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
June 30, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel’s Patient’s Rights Act
- Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries
- Consent for anaesthesia
- A report on small team clinical ethics consultation programmes in Japan
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- Students' responses to scenarios depicting ethical dilemmas: a study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand
- Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians
- Role of patients’ family members in end-of-life communication: an integrative review