Article Text
Abstract
Objective: To survey members of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH; n = 327) and of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM; n = 77) to elicit the similarities and differences in their reasoning about two clinical cases that involved ethical dilemmas.
Cases: Case 1 was that of a patient refusing treatment that a surgeon thought would be beneficial. Case 2 dealt with end-of-life care. The argument was whether intensive treatment should be continued of an unconscious patient with multiorgan failure.
Method: Four questions, with structured multiple alternatives, were asked about each case: identified core problems, needed additional information, appropriate next steps and who the decision maker should be.
Observations and results: Substantial similarities were noticed between the two groups in identifying the core problems, the information needed and the appropriate next steps. SMDM members gave more weight to outcomes and trade-offs and ASBH members had patient autonomy trump other considerations more strongly. In case 1, more than 60% of ASBH respondents identified the patient alone as the decision maker, whereas members of SMDM were almost evenly divided between having the patient as the solo decision maker or preferring a group of some sort as the decision maker, a significant difference (p<0.02). In case 2, both groups agreed that the question of discontinuing treatment should be discussed with the family and that the family alone should not be the decision maker.
Conclusion: Despite distinctively different methods of case analysis and little communication between the two professional communities, many similarities were observed in the actual decisions they reached on the two clinical dilemmas.
- ASBH, American Society for Bioethics and Humanities
- ICU, intensive care unit
- SMDM, Society for Medical Decision Making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel’s Patient’s Rights Act
- Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries
- Consent for anaesthesia
- A report on small team clinical ethics consultation programmes in Japan
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- Students' responses to scenarios depicting ethical dilemmas: a study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand
- Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians
- Role of patients’ family members in end-of-life communication: an integrative review