Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship
- Correspondence to: Michael S Henry Case Western Reserve University, 1681 E. 116th Street, #431D, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; michael.henry{at}case.edu
Citation
Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship
Publication history
- Received August 16, 2005
- Accepted August 21, 2005
- First published May 26, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden
- Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims
- Physicians with multiple patient complaints: ending our silence
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
- Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: a systematic review of the literature— targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators
- What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials
- Retrospective analysis of medical malpractice claims in tertiary hospitals of China: the view from patient safety
- Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs