Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond
- Correspondence to: L Purdy Wells College, 75 Turkey Hill Rd, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA; lpurdy{at}wells.edu
Citation
Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond
Publication history
- Received June 29, 2004
- Accepted July 25, 2005
- First published April 28, 2006.
Online issue publication
November 24, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Increased risk of congenital heart disease in twins in the North of England between 1998 and 2010
- Fetal and infant death in mono- and dizygotic twins in England and Wales 1982–91
- Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study
- Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the 'all or nothing problem’
- Population based study of rates of multiple pregnancies in denmark, 1980-94
- IVF twins: buy one get one free?
- Issues for service providers: a response to points raised
- Country-specific estimates of unintended pregnancy and abortion incidence: a global comparative analysis of levels in 2015–2019