Article Text

PDF
Stem cell research on other worlds, or why embryos do not have a right to life
  1. R Blackford
  1. Correspondence to:
 Russell Blackford
 School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia; Russell.Blackford{at}arts.monash.edu.au; russellblackford{at}bigpond.com

Abstract

Anxieties about the creation and destruction of human embryos for the purpose of scientific research on embryonic stem cells have given a new urgency to the question of whether embryos have moral rights. This article uses a thought experiment involving two possible worlds, somewhat removed from our own in the space of possibilities, to shed light on whether early embryos have such rights as a right not to be destroyed or discarded (a “right to life”). It is argued that early embryos do not have meaningful interests or any moral rights. Accordingly, claims about the moral rights of embryos do not justify restrictions on stem cell research.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • i This is the tenor of Abortion and Infanticide.1

  • ii I owe this expression, “props for morality”, to Rachels.4

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.