Article info
PDFEditorial
What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?
- Correspondence to: T Buller Philosophy Department, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK, USA; TomBuller{at}uaa.alaska.edu
Citation
What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?
Publication history
- Received November 7, 2005
- Accepted November 10, 2005
- First published January 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Should we enhance animals?
- Cyborgs and moral identity
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury