Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Stimulating debate: ethics in a multidisciplinary functional neurosurgery committee
- Correspondence to: Paul J Ford PhD, Department of Bioethics/JJ60, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; fordp{at}ccf.org
Citation
Stimulating debate: ethics in a multidisciplinary functional neurosurgery committee
Publication history
- Received June 15, 2005
- Accepted September 30, 2005
- Revised September 29, 2005
- First published January 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
October 14, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Deep brain stimulation: a return journey from psychiatry to neurology
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome
- Functional lesional neurosurgery for tremor: back to the future?
- Deep brain stimulation: practical insights and common queries
- The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
- Deep brain stimulation in 18 patients with severe Gilles de la Tourette syndrome refractory to treatment: the surgery and stimulation
- Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders
- Adoption of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: why so much fuss about FUS?
- Outcomes from stereotactic surgery for essential tremor
- Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control