Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison
- Correspondence to: M Dixon-Woods Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK; md11{at}le.ac.uk
Citation
Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison
Publication history
- Received August 30, 2005
- Accepted February 9, 2006
- Revised February 7, 2006
- First published October 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
- What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
- Research ethics committees and paternalism
- Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity