Article info
Global medical ethics
Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Correspondence to: S B Kennedy Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation (PIRE), Louisville Center, 1300 S Fourth Street, Suite 300, Louisville, KY 40208, USA; kennedy{at}pire.org
Citation
Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
Publication history
- Received September 15, 2005
- Accepted December 11, 2005
- Revised November 21, 2005
- First published September 29, 2006.
Online issue publication
September 29, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- Consolidate Human Research Oversight under Regional Ethics Boards, NIH Clinical Bioethics Department Proposes
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise
- Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?
- Maryland Court of Appeals Decision Threatens Research at Kennedy Krieger Institute
- Understanding Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Requirements for an Investigational Device Exemption for Sponsor-Investigators
- When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge