rss
J Med Ethics 2006;32:575-579 doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013391
  • General ethics

Formal and effective autonomy in healthcare

  1. A P Schwab
  1. Correspondence to:
 Abraham P Schwab
 Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College, 2900 Bedford Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA; ASchwab{at}brooklyn.cuny.edu
  • Received 5 July 2005
  • Accepted 13 January 2006
  • Revised 11 January 2006

Abstract

This essay lays the groundwork for a novel conception of autonomy that may be called “effective autonomy”—a conception designed to be genuinely action guiding in bioethics. As empirical psychology research on the heuristics and biases approach shows, decision making commonly fails to correspond to people’s desires because of the biases arising from bounded cognition. People who are classified as autonomous on contemporary philosophical accounts may fail to be effectively autonomous because their decisions are uncoupled from their autonomous desires. Accordingly, continuing attempts to value patient autonomy must go beyond existing philosophical conceptions of autonomy to consider the background conditions of human decision making.

Footnotes

  • i Berg et al12 provide (or attempt to provide) “a comprehensive introduction to the theory and practice of informed consent” for practicing clinicians and, yet, they never mention the psychology of decision making.

  • Competing interests: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.