Article info
PDFLaw, ethics, and medicine
Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Correspondence to: D W Brock Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02115; dan_brock{at}hms.harvard.edu
Citation
Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
Publication history
- Received July 27, 2005
- Accepted August 2, 2005
- First published December 22, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Ethics for embryos
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Abortion and human nature
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Time to reconsider stem cell ethics—the importance of induced pluripotent cells
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate