Article info
Global medical ethics
Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?
- Correspondence to: Hiroaki Miyata 5-23-9 Daita, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 155-0033, Japan; h-mumin.ac.jp
Citation
Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?
Publication history
- Received November 11, 2003
- Accepted October 21, 2004
- Revised June 28, 2004
- First published August 2, 2005.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2005
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Primary care physicians’ willingness to disclose oncology errors involving multiple providers to patients
- Negative recollections regarding doctor–patient interactions among men receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of patient experiences in Japan
- On higher ground: ethical reasoning and its relationship with error disclosure
- Cancer care in Romania: challenges and pitfalls of children's and adolescents' multifaceted involvement
- Perinatally acquired HIV-positive status disclosure and associated factors in Dire Dawa and Harar, Eastern Ethiopia: a health facility-based cross-sectional study
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Chinese perspective on end-of-life communication: a systematic review
- Cancer patients’ awareness of extent of disease: anxiety, depression, quality of life
- Exploring experiences of cancer care in Wales: a thematic analysis of free-text responses to the 2013 Wales Cancer Patient Experience Survey (WCPES)
- Canadian clinical capacity for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder assessment, diagnosis, disclosure and support to children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study