Article info
PDFEditorial
The Ad Hoc Advisory Group’s proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre
- Correspondence to: A J Dawson Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele Hall, Keele University, Staffs, ST5 5BG, UK; a.j.dawsonkeele.ac.uk; Website: www.keele.ac.uk/ethics
Citation
The Ad Hoc Advisory Group’s proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre
Publication history
- First published August 2, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is the NHS research ethics committees system to be outsourced to a low-cost offshore call centre? Reflections on human research ethics after the Warner Report
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease?
- Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined