Article Text
Abstract
Sen’s capabilities approach offers a radical generalisation of the conventional approach to welfare economics. It has been highly influential in development and many researchers are now beginning to explore its implications for health care. This paper contributes to the emerging debate by discussing two examples of such applications: first, at the individual decision making level, namely the right to die, and second, at the social choice level. For the first application, which draws on Nussbaum’s list of capabilities, it is argued that many capabilities are ambiguously or indirectly related to the right to die, but the ability to form a concept of the good life and plan one’s own life provides a direct justification for such a right. In the second application, the focus is specifically on healthcare rationing and it is argued that, although not committed to age based rationing, the capabilities approach provides a more natural justification of age related access to health care than the fair innings argument, which is often used to justify the alleged ageism inherent in quality adjusted life years (QALY) maximisation.
- capabilities
- medical decision making
- ethics
- health economics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The rationing debate: Rationing health care by age: The case against
- The fair innings argument and increasing life spans
- Ethics and ENDS
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle
- Economics and ethics in health care
- How should we prioritise global surgery? A capabilities approach argument for the place of surgery within every health system
- Conceptualising well-being for autistic persons
- Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
- NICE discrimination
- How to avoid unfair discrimination against disabled patients in healthcare resource allocation