Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Ethical dilemmas: feeding back results to members of a longitudinal cohort study
- Correspondence to: A Jeffery EarlyBird Study, Children’s Day Beds, Level 12, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK; alison.jefferypms.ac.uk
Citation
Ethical dilemmas: feeding back results to members of a longitudinal cohort study
Publication history
- Received July 22, 2004
- Accepted July 27, 2004
- First published February 28, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Physical activity at the government-recommended level and obesity-related health outcomes: a longitudinal study (Early Bird 37)
- Fatness leads to inactivity, but inactivity does not lead to fatness: a longitudinal study in children (EarlyBird 45)
- Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Cardiometabolic health in adolescence and its association with educational outcomes
- Understanding the rising incidence of type 2 diabetes in adolescence
- Awareness, experiences and perceptions regarding genetic testing and the return of genetic and genomics results in a hypothetical research context among patients in Uganda: a qualitative study
- Does birth weight predict childhood diet in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children?
- The influence of the food environment on overweight and obesity in young children: a systematic review
- Haemoglobin and red blood cell reference intervals during infancy
- Takeaway meal consumption and risk markers for coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity in children aged 9–10 years: a cross-sectional study