Article info
PDFReproduction
Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Correspondence to: Professor D Marquis Department of Philosophy, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA; dmarquisku.edu
Citation
Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
Publication history
- Accepted May 6, 2004
- First published January 28, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and human nature
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- A future like ours revisited
- The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
- A defence of the potential future of value theory