rss
J Med Ethics 2005;31:101-105 doi:10.1136/jme.2004.007856
  • Clinical ethics

Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle

  1. J P DeMarco
  1. Correspondence to:
 J P DeMarco
 Department of Philosophy, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio USA; j.demarcocsuohio.edu
  • Received 5 January 2004
  • Accepted 21 June 2004
  • Revised 19 June 2004

Abstract

Moral conflicts occur in theories that involve more than one principle. I examine basic ways of dealing with moral dilemmas in medical ethics and in ethics generally, and propose a different approach based on a principle I call the “mutuality principle”. It is offered as an addition to Tom Beauchamp and James Childress’ principlism. The principle calls for the mutual enhancement of basic moral values. After explaining the principle and its strengths, I test it by way of an examination of three responses—in the recent Festschrift for Dr Raanon Gillon—to a case involving parental refusal of a blood transfusion. The strongest response is the one that comes closest to the requirements of the mutuality principle but yet falls short. I argue that the mutuality principle provides an explicit future orientation in principlism and gives it greater moral coherence.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.