Article Text
PDFReproduction
The human embryo in the Christian tradition: a reconsideration
Abstract
Recent claims that the Christian tradition justifies destructive research on human embryos have drawn upon an article by the late Professor Gordon Dunstan which appeared in this journal in 1984. Despite its undoubted influence, this article was flawed and seriously misrepresented the tradition of Christian reflection on the moral status of the human embryo.
- embryo
- ethics
- Christianity
- history
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Response to: The human embryo in the Christian tradition
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Making regulations and drawing up legislation in Islamic countries under conditions of uncertainty, with special reference to embryonic stem cell research
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- The person, the soul, and genetic engineering
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Can a cell have a soul?
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Stem cell research on other worlds, or why embryos do not have a right to life