Article info
PDFLaw, ethics, and medicine
Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- Correspondence to: Professor H M Evans Snow College, University of Durham Queen’s Campus, Thornaby, Stockton on Tees, TS17 6BH, UK; h.m.evansdurham.ac.uk
Citation
Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
Publication history
- Received May 26, 2005
- Accepted May 31, 2005
- First published November 3, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Death and organ donation: back to the future
- The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- Is there a place for CPR and sustained physiological support in brain-dead non-donors?
- Christiaan Barnard: his first transplants and their impact on concepts of death
- The Declaration of Sydney on human death
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications