Article info
PDFMedical ethics
What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective
- Correspondence to: Julian Savulescu Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; julian.savulescuphilosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective
Publication history
- Received December 13, 2004
- Accepted December 17, 2004
- First published September 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial
- Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
- Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes
- The ethics of peer review in bioethics
- Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ
- Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals
- Blinding reviewers to authors' identity does not improve quality
- A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials