Article info
Electronic pages
The regulation of assisted reproductive technology
Citation
The regulation of assisted reproductive technology
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted conception. III–Problems with assisted conception
- Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles
- Is it ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it?
- Correlation of IVF outcomes and number of oocytes retrieved: a UK retrospective longitudinal observational study of 172 341 non-donor cycles
- Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women
- VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia
- Assisted conception. I—General principles
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Cohort profile: a national, population-based cohort of children born after assisted conception in the UK (1992–2009): methodology and birthweight analysis
- Lack of evidence for interventions offered in UK fertility centres