Responses
Reproduction
Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 18 May 2017
- Published on: 18 May 2017Response to the AuthorsShow More
Dear Editor,
This letter is in regard to the recent article that appeared in Volume 30 of the Journal of Medical Ethics, entitled "Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies". I am the senior legal advisor to Health Canada for the development and implementation of the Assisted Human Reproductio...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics
- UN delays decision on human cloning