Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
A RESPONSE TO ANDORNO
Dr Andorno and I have corresponded for some time on the question of a right not to know (genetic) information. I enjoyed reading his paper and I am struck by the degree of agreement that we share. We both agree—for example, that unsolicited knowledge can be a burden which can significantly compromise an individual’s psychological integrity. We both share a desire to respect individual self determination. Also we each consider it reasonable for individuals to choose not to receive potentially harmful information. I have already made these arguments, and more, elsewhere,1 but my starting point has not been autonomy, as advocated by Andorno, but rather privacy. In essence, my argument is that individuals enjoy, and are entitled to enjoy, a measure of psychological privacy which can be invaded by unwarranted disclosures of information (Laurie,1 pp 255–74).
The reason that I prefer privacy to autonomy is not because I have any wish to “deny people the right to self determination”2 but rather because I perceive deficiencies in the autonomy model. Indeed, my approach and that of Andorno are not mutually exclusive; it is simply that my approach is broader and encompasses some of the harder cases which an autonomy based approach cannot help us to resolve. Thus, most of the substance of Andorno’s approach is subsumed within my model. I have—for example, no disagreement whatsoever with the view that if you have an indication that an individual would not wish to know then this wish should be respected. One might even establish novel means of discerning individuals’ wishes by establishing a register to record advance refusals, as Andorno …
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The right not to know: an autonomy based approach
- Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Late onset genetic disease: where ignorance is bliss, is it folly to inform relatives?
- On the impermissibility of infant male circumcision: a response to Mazor (2013)
- In defence of personal autonomy
- “I can put the medicine in his soup, Doctor!”
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Disclosure of incidental constituents of psychotherapy as a moral obligation for psychiatrists and psychotherapists
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy