Article info
PDFEditorial
The role of medical imaging in the abortion debate
- Correspondence to: Deborah Kirklin Senior Lecturer in Medical Humanities & Director, Centre for Medical Humanities, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Archway Campus, 2nd Floor Holborn Union Building, 2-10 Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW, UK; d.kirklinpcps.ucl.ac.uk
Citation
The role of medical imaging in the abortion debate
Publication history
- First published October 5, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Where do we draw the line?
- Medical students’ attitudes towards abortion: a UK study
- The place for individual conscience
- Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- Issues for service providers: a response to points raised
- The new ethics of abortion
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- A future like ours revisited
- We’re horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade—but abortion is not a universal right in the UK