Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
- Correspondence to: Cicely Kerr Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; c.e.p.kerrkeele.ac.uk
Citation
Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
Publication history
- Accepted January 26, 2003
- Revised July 18, 2002
- First published February 10, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Relative importance of informational items in participant information leaflets for trials: a Q-methodology approach
- Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Decision aids for randomised controlled trials: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders’ views
- Quality of reporting and risk of bias: a review of randomised trials in occupational health
- Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision
- Allocation concealment in randomised controlled trials: are we getting better?
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
- Non-adherence in non-inferiority trials: pitfalls and recommendations
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Attitudes of patients and surgeons towards sham surgery trials: a protocol for a scoping review of attributes to inform a discrete choice experiment