rss
J Med Ethics 2003;29:313-314 doi:10.1136/jme.29.6.313
  • NICE and the draft fertility guideline
  • Editorial

NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question

  1. J R McMillan
  1. Correspondence to:
 J R McMillan
 Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK; jm439cam.ac.uk

    NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question: should fertility treatment be provided by the NHS?

    In August of this year the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) made its draft guideline on fertility treatment available for consultation.1 As has been widely reported in the media the draft guideline recommends that the National Health Service (NHS) should provide publicly funded fertility treatment in a consistent way across England and Wales. The guideline recommends that three cycles of IVF should be available when “The woman is within the optimal range for in vitro fertilisation (that is, the woman is 23–39 years) and there is an appropriately diagnosed cause of infertility of any duration, or unexplained infertility of at least three years’ duration (including mild endometriosis and mild semen abnormality” (National Institute for Clinical Excellence,1 p 35).

    Those who need fertility treatment will celebrate the guideline, as will many fertility clinics. The guideline does not, however, address key questions that will be obvious to many. Is fertility treatment the kind of thing that ought to be available on the NHS? Will the inevitable increase in demand mean that resources are directed away from other services? Is fertility treatment really the same kind of intervention as heart or hip replacement surgery?

    My view is that there are good reasons for doing what we can to help people access fertility services. Most of us will start a family and for those of us who do it is probably the most important of all of our life projects. Given that social status and wealth can be significant obstacles to many of the things that people would like to do with their lives, the fact that most of us are able to pursue this important life project is good from an egalitarian …

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.