Article info
Symposium on psychiatric ethics
“Cold calling” in psychiatric follow up studies: is it justified?
- Correspondence to: Professor P Tyrer, Paterson Centre, 20 South Wharf Road, London W2 1PD, UK; p.tyrer{at}ic.ac.uk
Citation
“Cold calling” in psychiatric follow up studies: is it justified?
Publication history
- Accepted September 9, 2002
- Revised June 17, 2002
- First published August 20, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- K-ras mutations in the bile of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Follow up studies in rheumatoid arthritis
- Next day telephone follow up of the elderly: a needs assessment and critical incident monitoring tool for the accident and emergency department
- Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial
- Results of three to 10 year follow up of balloon dilatation of the pulmonary valve
- A follow up study of myocardial involvement in patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS)
- Acute gastritis with hypochlorhydria: report of 35 cases with long term follow up
- Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series
- Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home: 24 weeks' prospective follow up study
- Long term outcome after coronary stent implantation: a 10 year single centre experience of 1000 patients