Article Text
Abstract
A proposal to allow prisoners to save their lives or to be eligible for commutation of sentence by donating kidneys for transplantation has been a subject of controversy in the Philippines. Notwithstanding the vulnerabilities associated with imprisonment, there are good reasons for allowing organ donations by prisoners. Under certain conditions, such donations can be very beneficial not only to the recipients but to the prisoners themselves. While protection needs to be given to avoid coercion and exploitation, overprotection has to be avoided. The prohibition on the involvement of prisoners in organ transplantation constitutes unjustified overprotection. Under certain conditions, prisoners can make genuinely independent decisions. When it can be reasonably ascertained that they are able to decide freely, society should recognise an obligation to help them implement their decisions, such as when they intend to donate an organ as a way of asserting their religious faith and performing a sacrifice in atonement for their sins.
- ethics
- organ donation
- prisoners
- transplantation
- vulnerability
- atonement
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Other content recommended for you
- Why journals should stop publishing transplantation research from China
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Organ Transplants from Executed Prisoners
- Impact of donor with evidence of bacterial infections on deceased donor liver transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study in Taiwan
- Unwilling executioners?
- Individual readiness for transplantation medicine of laypersons and the number of deceased organ donors: a cross-sectional online survey in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan
- Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
- Critical care in the Emergency Department: organ donation
- Should we perform kidney transplants on foreign nationals?
- Xenotransplantation: a bioethical evaluation