Article info
PDFControversy
Commodification and exploitation: arguments in favour of compensated organ donation
- Correspondence to: Dr L D de Castro, Department of Philosophy, University of the Philippines, 126 Bernard St, Area 2, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; decastro{at}skyinet.net
Citation
Commodification and exploitation: arguments in favour of compensated organ donation
Publication history
- Accepted January 28, 2003
- Revised November 19, 2002
- First published June 1, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
- A legal market in organs: the problem of exploitation
- Paying for particulars in people-to-be: commercialisation, commodification and commensurability in human reproduction
- Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal
- Shifting ethics: debating the incentive question in organ transplantation
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Should gratitude be a requirement for access to live organ donation?
- Hauntological dimensions of heart transplantation: the onto-epistemologies of deceased donation
- Moral distress and moral residue experienced by transplant coordinators
- If I were a rich man could I sell a pancreas? A study in the locus of oppression