Article Text
Abstract
On occasions, laws on consent are subject to modification, largely on account of being subject to common law rather than statute—for example, in the UK. Guideline publications such as the UK Department of Health Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment are intended to provide information for clinicians on when and how to apply current laws in everyday clinical situations. While the extent to which guidelines influence clinician behaviour depends on how much they are read and followed, what is also relevant, and sometimes omitted from consideration, is discussion about underlying philosophical concepts.
This paper analyses philosophical weaknesses relating to English laws on consent, the main focus of attention being applied ethics and the rights of adults with incapacity. It draws comparisons between the US and the UK, and advocates changes in English law in order to help rectify weaknesses in patient protection. Discussion includes references to Scottish law, and the use of advance directives, and it voices concerns about over-reliance on “best interests” determinations. The problem is partly one of logical analysis, and what can happen is that best interests determinations fail to show proper respect for adults lacking the capacity to consent to examination or treatment on their own behalf. This is fundamentally a matter of rights, and requires further investigation and appropriate legal remedies in order to respond to ethical deficiencies in English law as it now stands.
- Informed consent
- law and consent
- medical ethics and the law
- advance directives
- best interests
- rights
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The role of law in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack capacity: a cross-sectional study
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Advance directives and end-of-life decisions in Switzerland: role of patients, relatives and health professionals
- An audit of “do not attempt resuscitation” decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?
- Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing
- Parenteral nutrition: ethical and legal considerations
- Evolving legal responses to dependence on families in New Zealand and Singapore healthcare
- Determinants of completion of advance directives: a cross-sectional comparison of 649 outpatients from private practices versus 2158 outpatients from a university clinic
- Montgomery, informed consent and causation of harm: lessons from Australia or a uniquely English approach to patient autonomy?