rss
J Med Ethics 2002;28:329 doi:10.1136/jme.28.5.329
  • Letter

Medical commitments ceremonies

  1. J Grimley Evans
  1. Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Division of Clinical Geratology, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE; john.grimleyevans{at}geratology.oxford.ac.uk

      I read Raanan Gillon’s piece on the defence of medical commitments ceremonies with interest.1 I was, however, disturbed to see that in the declaration of a new doctor considered satisfactory at Imperial College there is no mention of age among the politically correct list of human and social characteristics that should not influence a doctor’s duty of care. The omission is conspicuous in view of the abundant evidence that age discrimination is widely practised in medicine and that it has recently been proscribed in the National Service Framework for Older People.

      Does this mean that I must advise all my elderly patients that in any encounters with graduates of Imperial College they must insist on a second opinion?

      Reference

      Register for free content


      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
      View free sample issue >>

      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.