rss
J Med Ethics 28:249-254 doi:10.1136/jme.28.4.249
  • Original Article

Consent, sectionalisation and the concept of a medical procedure

  1. A R Maclean
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr A R Maclean, The School of Law, The Stair Building, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ;
 a.maclean{at}law.gla.ac.uk
  • Accepted 12 March 2002
  • Revised 8 February 2002

Abstract

Consent transforms an otherwise illegitimate act into a legitimate one. To be valid, however, it must be adequately informed. The legal requirement is vague and provides little assistance in predicting when it will be satisfied. This is particularly so when a patient consents to a procedure and the physician subsequently varies one of the components of that procedure. Using three legal judgments and one General Medical Council (GMC) decision as a springboard, I have explored the concept of a medical procedure within the context of consent and developed a theoretical model to elucidate a more predictable and consistent informational requirement.

Footnotes

    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
    View free sample issue >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Navigate This Article